the-climate-reality-project-349084-unsplash Photo by The Climate Reality Project on Unsplash
Type post
Author
Stephen C. Meyer
Date September 10, 2003
Categorized Critique and Response Tagged , covering law model , Darwinism , defining science , definitions of science , evolution , fact or theory , Michael Ruse , natural laws , research program , response to criticism
Stephen C. Meyer
September 10, 2003
Critique and Response
Establishing a rigid line of demarcation is especially difficult in the vexing world of origins research. So I appreciate Professor Ruse’s drawing our attention to what is perhaps a false dichotomy. Read More ›
Joe Rogan and Stephen Meyer Talk Science and Faith in New Interview
July 13, 2023
The Uniqueness of the Human Mind: Stephen Meyer and Janet Parshall
January 24, 2023
Here’s Why James Webb Telescope Discoveries Are Causing Scientists To Rethink Galaxy Formation (But Not The Big Bang)
September 27, 2022
Science & Christianity: How Science Can Strengthen Your Teen’s Faith
July 1, 2022
Scientific Discoveries Reveal the Mind of God Behind the Universe
April 1, 2021
How Science Stopped Backing Atheists and Started Pointing Back to God
July 14, 2022
Meyer and Medved Discuss the Madness of the Multiverse
June 22, 2022
The Madness of the Multiverse and the Strangeness of Atheism
June 3, 2022
God’s Footprints: Science Makes Faith Plausible, Not Impossible
April 11, 2022
Dennis Prager and Stephen Meyer Introduce New PragerU Video Series Making the Case for a Return of the God Hypothesis
January 5, 2022
