the-climate-reality-project-349084-unsplash Photo by The Climate Reality Project on Unsplash
Type post
Author
Stephen C. Meyer
Date September 10, 2003
Categorized Critique and Response Tagged , covering law model , Darwinism , defining science , definitions of science , evolution , fact or theory , Michael Ruse , natural laws , research program , response to criticism
Stephen C. Meyer
September 10, 2003
Critique and Response
Establishing a rigid line of demarcation is especially difficult in the vexing world of origins research. So I appreciate Professor Ruse’s drawing our attention to what is perhaps a false dichotomy. Read More ›
Meyer and Medved Discuss the Madness of the Multiverse
June 22, 2022
The Madness of the Multiverse and the Strangeness of Atheism
June 3, 2022
God’s Footprints: Science Makes Faith Plausible, Not Impossible
April 11, 2022
Dennis Prager and Stephen Meyer Introduce New PragerU Video Series Making the Case for a Return of the God Hypothesis
January 5, 2022
NASA To Launch Telescope Stronger Than Hubble That Can See Back In Time
December 22, 2021
Let There Be Light: Meyer and Medved Discuss Promise of New NASA Telescope
December 23, 2021
On Science and God at PragerU
December 20, 2021
Stand to Reason: A Discussion of Reasoning and Evidence for the God Hypothesis
November 24, 2021
The New Oxford Review profiles Return of the God Hypothesis
November 15, 2021
Why Scientific Atheism is Stuck in the 19th Century: Stephen Meyer on The Andrew Klavan Show
October 26, 2021
