I was impressed by a lecture by philosopher of science Stephen Meyer, who presented versions of the cosmological argument and the fine-tuning argument.
Expert witnesses like biochemist Michael Behe and microbiologist Scott Minnich testified about how irreducible complexity makes a positive case for design.
It was last month that another think tank — with a lot of great people there — split down the middle over the organization’s partnership with Tucker Carlson.
It’s the season of the unexpected convert, isn’t it? Musk has more than enough smarts to evaluate that evidence for himself, once he has got it in front of him.
Judge Jones looked my way, and his expression seemed full of fellow feeling, as if to say, “Don’t sweat it. I’m all about free speech. I’ve got your back.”
One reason is the way any materialist explanation of cosmic origins keeps looking more and more implausible. See the new book by Charles Murray on that.
The central scientific issue with theistic evolution is that it inherits all the scientific problems associated with the standard evolutionary account.
In 1984, three scientists dared to probe the mystery of life’s origin by putting the prevailing theories of prebiotic and chemical evolution to the test.
Why there is something rather than nothing is the question posed in our video, “Proof of God in 3 Minutes,” about the law of conservation of matter and energy.
